![]() |
|
![]() |
|
The first simulations were computed with Re=140 to obtain a time periodic solution. A steady state case was then run at Re=28. For each simulation the circumferential element length remained constant while the radial element length was modified.
![]() |
![]() |
It was difficult to draw conclusions from this plot of the time periodic solution. There is a clear constant region of points that are considered "good", but it was difficult to say what was happening on either side of this region. To determine what was happening, the standard deviation of the maximum drag for each time periodic solution was calculated. Large standard deviation indicates a nonperiodic solution and the calculated average drag can not be trusted.![]()
To eliminate the factor of time, simulations were run at Re=28 for a steady state solution. The following is a plot of average drag vs. element thickness for the steady state case.![]()